Author Topic: Upgraded to 1.7 - Where are the new features?  (Read 3212 times)

adz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Upgraded to 1.7 - Where are the new features?
« on: March 21, 2011, 21:20:40 »
Hello,

I upgraded to the latest version today (1.7)

When I select Show License Information, it says i'm running:
Loway QueueMetrics - 1.7.0.0
B: 3487 2011-03-17 10:25

I don't see any of these great new features though - it all looks the same as 1.6.0.1

Am I missing something?

- I've cleared the catalina cache
- Cleared local cache and tried different browser

QueueMetrics

  • Loway
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2999
  • Karma: 39
    • View Profile
    • QueueMetrics
Re: Upgraded to 1.7 - Where are the new features?
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2011, 14:45:40 »
When you run an upgrade, you should add manually the security keys that unlock each new feature - we do not do it manually because we think that people who have a system in production do not want to see it changed unless they manually activate features.

adz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Upgraded to 1.7 - Where are the new features?
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2011, 16:12:57 »
Ahh. Thank you very much.

So I added tasks, and tasks_viewall. I have the new icons at the top now (rss, and the paper icon)

I don't see any way I can create a task. Am I blind :)

Looking forward to trying out this great new feature.

adz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Karma: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Upgraded to 1.7 - Where are the new features?
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2011, 17:51:35 »
ok...doing a bit more playing, it seems like the tasks functionality is tied into QA.

I was more hoping it would be a generic task function:

Agent/1001 - Go take out the trash [Completed!]

QueueMetrics

  • Loway
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2999
  • Karma: 39
    • View Profile
    • QueueMetrics
Re: Upgraded to 1.7 - Where are the new features?
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2011, 11:43:06 »
We plan to expand that in the future, in fact I am sure a generic "send task" command would be useful. I am adding this as bug #1292.